Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton
05-28-2015, 01:50 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton
(05-25-2015 07:30 AM)Eli Wrote: Deet is carcinogenic. Use citronella instead. Deet is approved by Health Canada and widely accepted as a good repellent against mosquitos and ticks. Carcinogenicity: Animals Researchers fed DEET to male and female rats in the diet for two years at doses of 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day, and 30, 100, or 400 mg/kg/day, respectively. Researchers fed mice 250, 500, or 1,000 mg/kg/day for 18 months, and dogs 30, 100, or 400 mg/kg/day. No specific target organ toxicity or oncogenicity was observed in any of the animals.14 Researchers often use studies designed to test for mutagenicity to screen chemicals for carcinogenicity. Sufficient evidence indicates that DEET does not have significant potential for mutagenicity.15 Humans The U.S. EPA classified DEET as "Group D - not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity" based on inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity, or lack of data in laboratory animals and humans.1 See the text box on Cancer. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - Latenightcam - 05-25-2015, 12:59 AM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - Eli - 05-25-2015, 07:30 AM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - Latenightcam - 05-28-2015 01:50 AM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - MuskieBait - 05-28-2015, 07:05 AM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - OldTimer - 05-28-2015, 02:58 PM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - Eli - 05-28-2015, 01:35 PM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - OldTimer - 05-25-2015, 08:05 AM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - GailBait - 05-28-2015, 03:52 PM
RE: Ticks at Binbrook Hamilton - Eli - 05-28-2015, 05:52 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Options | |
Loading... |
Smilies
Popup Shoutbox |
Return to TopReturn to Content